Statutory Demands – Pitfalls for your clients on either side of the fence
January 7, 2020
Lately I have been asked about the key elements of Statutory Demands how they work, when they are appropriate to use and how to possibly defend one in the event one is received. So I felt it would be beneficial to put together this overview for our readers out there.
If you have a client who is thinking about issuing a Statutory Demand, or may have received one, I am sure you will find this article to be useful.
The technical elements of a Statutory Demand are set out in section 459E of the Corporations Act 2001 and briefly, are as follows:
- A Statutory Demand is served on a company, most commonly at its registered office (note that Statutory Demands do not apply to an individual – the equivalent in the personal insolvency world is a Bankruptcy Notice, and it works is a similar way to a Statutory Demand)
- In a Statutory Demand there is a statutory minimum to be owed to the creditor by the debtor of $2,000
- The form must:
- specify the amount owed in an unambiguous and clearly quantified way, so as to avoid the risk of having the demand set aside; and
- specify a period of no less than 21 days for the debtor to pay up following service of the demand; and
- be in writing; and
- be signed by, or on behalf of, the creditor.
- If the debt is not a judgement debt, that is a
debt that has been ruled on by a Court as being owed, the form must be
accompanied by an affidavit that:
- verifies the debt; and
- complies with the rules – those being the rules of the relevant Court (i.e. Supreme Court of Western Australia, Federal Court of Australia etc.).
In practice, there are a number of interesting considerations that arise in relation to Statutory Demands.
The most common means of service is by leaving the Statutory Demand at the company’s registered office, or by delivering a copy personally to a director of the company.
If a creditor is aware that the company no longer resides at a particular registered office and the creditor knows the details of the new address, then the new address should be used.
Statutory Demands can be ‘set aside’
If a client issues or receives a Statutory Demand and one or more of the circumstances discussed below exist, they should be aware that the Statutory Demand can be ‘set aside’ by the Court.
If the intention is to apply to have the Statutory Demand set aside, an application must be made under section 459G within the 21 days following the service of the demand. So time is of the essence – do not delay.
The application must be more substantive than simply “this debt is not owed”. In fact, an affidavit must be filed with the application that contains details about why the demand is refuted and it must be as complete as possible – an affidavit or a supplementary affidavit filed after the 21 days has expired will not be considered by the Court.
The reasons that a Court may set aside a Statutory Demand include:
- The debt is less that the statutory minimum of $2,000 (section 459H)
- There is a defect in the Statutory Demand that would cause substantial injustice if it were not to be set aside (section 459J(1)(a))
- A minor defect or irregularity would most likely not be seen as fatal, however the overall impact of the defect can be a subjective call in the eyes of the Court
- There is some other reason why the demand should be set aside (section 459J(1)(b))
One of the most common reasons to set aside a Statutory Demand is the existence of a ‘genuine dispute’ as to the whole quantum or nature of the debt. This means that the dispute must be genuine and the grounds for disputing the entire debt must not be spurious, hypothetical, illusory or misconceived (credit for those clever words goes to Austin J in Goldspar Australia Pty Limited v KSW Design Group Pty Limited  NSWSC 502).
Presumption of insolvency in a subsequent winding up application
Aside from eliciting a payment, which is the ideal outcome for a creditor that is owed the money, a Statutory Demand that later expires can be used as a ‘presumption of insolvency’ in a winding up application to be heard before a Court. Section 459C lists the presumptions that the Court must adhere to, however there is a three month limit to be aware of.
In other words, a winding up application commenced by a creditor can rely on the debtor’s failure to comply with a Statutory Demand as a presumption of insolvency only if the winding up application is lodged within three months of service of the Statutory Demand.
Recipients of Statutory Demands should also be aware that once a winding up application is filed, directors and shareholders cannot voluntarily resolve to place the company into liquidation.
The only voluntary formal option once a winding up petition has been filed with the Court is to appoint a Voluntary Administrator, however the Court would need to be satisfied that the Voluntary Administration and a subsequent Deed of Company Arrangement proposal was a viable and realistic option, which would result in a stay of the winding up application.
This is not a simple process and our observation is that the Courts are increasingly ordering companies should go into liquidation, despite a Voluntary Administrator having been appointed after the filing of a winding up application but before the Court hearing to wind up the company.
Key takeaways to be aware of
Statutory Demands should be respected. This means that they should only be issued as part of a genuine debt recovery process or challenged where a genuine dispute exists.
Creditors ought to be aware that Statutory Demands can be set aside, so it is time and money well spent to get the ducks lined up before the demand is served.
Debtors should be aware of their options to set aside a Statutory Demand and critically the timeframe to do so, i.e. within the 21 day Statutory Demand period. Failure to comply means the creditor may commence a winding up application to wind up the debtor company.
If you have a client who has any queries about Statutory Demands, please feel free to get in touch with me. I am happy to be a sounding board on any issues that may come up in relation to any insolvency matters.
Please note that this article does not constitute legal advice and you should not rely upon it. You should always consult your legal representatives on matters of this nature. We at HLB Mann Judd Insolvency WA are happy to put you in contact with legal specialists who deal with these matters. Please feel free to contact us on 08 9215 7900 if you require any further assistance.
About the author
Greg Quin is a Director at HLB Mann Judd Insolvency WA and has been with the team for 10 years. Greg oversees the daily operations of the many insolvency appointments managed by the HLB Insolvency team and looks after the operations of the practice.
If you have any queries about insolvency matters, please feel free to contact Greg on 08 9215 7900, 0402 943 091 or via email to email@example.com.