In-specie land distributions and concessional transfer duty assessments. What the OSR takes into account when assessing eligibility in a Members’ Voluntary Liquidation

September 13, 2019

Land2

In-specie distributions of land in a Members’ Voluntary Liquidation are common. They are an effective way to transfer land out of the name of a corporation and into the names of the shareholders and in most circumstances, in a way that minimises transfer duty levied by the Western Australian Office of State Revenue (“OSR”).

Briefly, nominal duty is chargeable on a dutiable transaction that is a transfer of corporation property if the total value of the transaction to the shareholder, when the winding up begins, is equal to or less than the value of the shareholder’s entitlement to the net assets of the corporation at that time.

In other words, nominal transfer duty is chargeable on a transfer of land if the shareholder receives an entitlement to land proportionate to, or less than, their shareholding proportion in the company.

For the assessment of nominal transfer duty as a consequence of a Members’ Voluntary Liquidation to apply, the following will need to be provided to the OSR (key elements are provided – there are more!):

  1. The transaction record (such as a transfer or agreement to transfer)
  2. A Statutory Declaration by the Liquidator that includes:

a)  Confirmation of the winding up details

b)  Complete financial statements of the corporation:

i. As at the date of winding up

ii. Immediately following the date of winding up

iii. As at 30 June the previous financial year

c)  Details of the share capital of the corporation and a listing of the shareholders and their respective holdings as at the date of winding up

d)  Details of the rights of each class of share

e)  Details of any amounts owed to a shareholder that the shareholder has released the corporation from paying during the period beginning 12 months before the winding up commenced and ending when the property is transferred

f)  Details of any liabilities that a shareholder has assumed or discharged on behalf of the corporation during the period beginning 12 months before the winding up commenced and ending when the property is transferred

g)  The date each shareholder acquired their individual shareholding

h)  Confirmation that it is intended to distribute the assets of the corporation to the shareholders in accordance with their respective beneficial entitlements and details of how the distribution is to be made

i)  Where the property was previously owned by a corporation related to the corporation being wound up, confirmation of whether or not any shareholder held shares in that related corporation

j)  Dates of acquisition of the property by the corporation or a related corporation

k)  Details of any dealings in shares of the corporation or a related corporation by a shareholder or a previous owner of the property

There are some other considerations that the OSR takes into account also, which can be obtained from their website here.

The point of all of this is so the OSR can make a clear assessment on whether the right amount of transfer duty should be.

In a recent case we dealt with at HLB Mann Judd Insolvency WA, the director said there were two identical parcels of land to be distributed to the two, 50/50 shareholders. At face value, the nominal transfer duty concession would apply, right? Wrong.

Upon further inspection of the records, there was a third shareholder in the company that transferred its shares equally to the remaining two shareholders for no consideration only a few months prior to the intended winding up. The reason for this was simply to make the whole process simpler – two parcels of land and two shareholders instead of three.

This creates a problem, in that the full rate of transfer duty would be assessable on the proportion of the land that the ‘third’ shareholder would have ordinarily received. It will still be an advantageous outcome, but not as good as it could have been.

Members’ Voluntary Liquidations are not only effective from the perspective of accessing pre-CGT gains and other tax concessions and discounts in a tax effective ways, but also from a transfer duty angle also – but there are some traps if you do not know what to look out for.

If you have a client that is a candidate for a Members’ Voluntary Liquidation, then please feel free to get in touch with us for a cost and obligation free consultation regarding the ins and outs of the process.

As our example above points out, an early discussion could save a fair bit of money at the end of the day.

About the author

Greg Quin is a Director at HLB Mann Judd Insolvency WA and has been with the team for 10 years. Greg oversees the daily operations of the many insolvency appointments managed by the HLB Insolvency team and looks after the operations of the practice.

If you have any queries about insolvency matters, please feel free to contact Greg on 08 9215 7900, 0402 943 091 or via email to gquin@hlbinsol.com.au.

Get in touch

Get in touch

Whatever your question, our team in Perth will aim to find the best solution for you

Start the conversation
x
x

Share to:

Copy link:

Copied to clipboard Copy