For a Liquidator, proving insolvency is difficult. Even with the benefit of accurate records and 20/20 hindsight, free from the distraction of financial distress that clouds the judgement of directors when particular debts are incurred, it is still complex and can be costly to pinpoint and quantify. We start with the indicators of insolvency, however drilling down to a specific point in time requires a high degree of analysis.
Take into account the defences that are available to directors, and it becomes even more challenging to achieve a recovery from directors for breaches of the insolvent trading provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (“the Act”).
An exception to this general positon is when a company does not maintain proper books and records as required by section 286 of the Act, thereby allowing a Liquidator to enliven section 588E of the Act.
Let’s unpack these two provisions first.
Section 286 says a company [and other types of entities] must keep written financial records that:
- Subsection (1)(a): correctly record and explain its transactions and financial position and performance; and
- Subsection (1)(b): would enable true and fair financial statements to be prepared and audited.
- Subsection (2): The financial records must be retained for 7 years after the transactions covered by the records are completed.
Section 588E of the Act says that if a company has:
- Failed to keep financial records in relation to a period as required by section 286(1); or
- Failed to retain financial records in relation to a period for 7 years required by section 286(2);
then the company is to be presumed to have been insolvent throughout the period.
At HLB Mann Judd Insolvency WA, we have dealt with several cases that turn on a lack of proper books and records. Typical indicators include:
- Poorly maintained management accounting software (or worse yet, no MYOB or equivalent)
- Undisclosed liabilities
- Assets recorded at higher than recoverable values
- Unreported and unrecorded superannuation and tax liabilities
- No banking reconciliations
- Or simply rare cases where no records are delivered up at all
In a recent case dealing with this matter, Substance Technologies Pty Ltd  NSWSC 612, the directors of the company in liquidation refused to deliver the records of the Liquidator on the basis that by doing so, it would lead to self-incrimination.
With no records to examine, the Liquidator had little choice other than to enliven section 588E.
The wash up was that the company was found to have not maintained proper books and records, and accordingly was deemed to be insolvent during the entire seven year period set out in section 286(2).
The message here for directors and their accountants is clearly to ensure that books and records comply with the requirements of section 286 and if a company does end up in liquidation, that directors comply with their requirements to deliver the books and records of the company to the Liquidator.
About the author
Greg Quin is a Director at HLB Mann Judd Insolvency WA and has been with the team for 10 years. Greg oversees the daily operations of the many insolvency appointments managed by the HLB Insolvency team and looks after the operations of the practice.
If you have any queries about insolvency matters, please feel free to contact Greg on 08 9215 7900, 0402 943 091 or via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.